OWASP Top 10, business logic, auth flows and access control — tested by humans.
We test your application the way a motivated attacker would — but with your authorization. Automated tooling supports discovery; every real finding comes from manual analysis.
We focus on issues scanners miss: multi-step business logic, race conditions, privilege escalation between roles, and flawed trust boundaries.
Manual testing discipline automation can't reproduce
Attack simulation grounded in how the app is meant to be used
Perspective checks across users, roles and tenants
Only verified, exploitation-proven findings
Our web assessments are anchored in the industry's most rigorous frameworks, so findings map directly to what your auditors and clients expect. Methodology follows OWASP WSTG and the OWASP Top 10, with coverage references to SANS CWE Top 25 and NIST guidance.
How we break into your web application, in four disciplines
Automation covers the well-known surface quickly; everything hard-to-*find* then goes to a human who pulls components apart and reasons about them.
Battle-tested methodology mapped to OWASP Top 10 and beyond — logic abuse, chained weaknesses, trust-boundary mistakes.
When source is available, a high-level review of the codebase spots bugs, insecure patterns and standard violations before they ship.
Internal attack tooling and lessons from thousands of app engagements keep your assessment aligned with what active adversaries use today.
Reporting templates map findings to the controls and sections auditors care about, so a single engagement feeds SOC 2 Type II evidence, ISO 27001 risk treatment, HIPAA or PCI-DSS reviews without extra paperwork.
Everything you receive, beyond the findings list
Comprehensive, navigable and written to be read — main body, per-finding detail, and screenshots.
Actionable remediation steps per finding, sized to effort where possible.
Real-time collaboration with your team for questions, scope changes and urgent findings.
We retest deployed fixes to confirm they hold — included, not invoiced.
A formal letter stating the test and its outcome, ready for clients and auditors.
A debrief session for your engineering team to walk through the findings and priorities.
Injection flaws (SQL, NoSQL, command, SSTI)
Broken authentication & session management
Broken access control / IDOR / privilege escalation
XSS, CSRF, SSRF, open redirects, file upload abuse
Multi-step business logic & pricing flow abuse
Misconfigurations, debug artifacts, sensitive data exposure
Rate limiting & anti-automation controls
Third-party and API integrations
Scenario 01
An attacker escalates from a customer account to another tenant's data.
Scenario 02
Chained vulnerabilities: SSRF reaching, then metadata leak, then takeover.
Scenario 03
Malicious user manipulates checkout logic to get negative prices.
Scenario 04
Session tokens leak onto subdomains or third-party scripts.
The endpoint /api/invoices/{accountId} accepted any numeric accountId for logged-in users, returning other tenants' invoice PDFs. Automated enumeration harvested all invoices in under an hour.
Remediation
Enforce server-side ownership checks on accountId; add authorization tests to CI; audit sibling endpoints for the same pattern.
CVSSv3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Our testers continuously study emerging attacker techniques, so the tests include vulnerabilities that haven't yet landed in public frameworks.
See how engagements are packaged and priced
View plans & pricingFAQ
Everything CTOs and CISOs ask us before scoping.
Tell us what you'd like tested. We reply with a written scope (and NDA) within one business day.
Get a quote